##### Please answer with explanation of how you arrived at the issue-(Answered)

**Description**

Step-by-step Instant Solution

**Question**

Please answer with explanation of how you arrived at the issue

Situation 7.2.1:

A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income), family size (Size), and

House size is measured in hundreds of square feet, income is measured in thousands of dollars, and education is in years. The b

the multiple regression. The output is provided below:

Variable

Coefficient

t-statistic

Constant

-1.633

-0.281

Income

0.448

3.954

Size

4.216

5.286

School

-0.6517

-1.509

R2 =0.75; Adjusted R2 = 0.73

F = 6.43

12.

Referring to Situation 7.2.1, which of the following values for the level of significance is the smallest for which at least two explana

A) 0.01

B) 0.025

C) 0.05

D) 0.15

Please explain how the answer was derived using a one tail or two tail?

14.

Referring to Situation 7.2.1, which of the following values for the level of significance is the smallest for which the regression mod

A) 0.00005

B) 0.001

C) 0.01

D) 0.05

Please explain how the answer was derived using a one tail or two tail?

15.

Referring to Situation 7.2.1, what is the predicted house size (in hundreds of square feet) for an individual

earning an annual income of $40,000, having a family size of four, and going to school a total of 13 years?

A) 11.43

B) 15.15

C) 24.68

D) 53.87

Please show the equation used and how you arrived at answer

16.

Referring to Situation 7.2.1, one individual in the sample had an annual income of $100,000, a family size of

10, and an education of 16 years. This individual owned a home with an area of 7,000 square feet (House =

70.00). What is the residual (in hundreds of square feet) for this data point?

A) 7.40

B) 2.52

C) ? 2.52

D) ? 4.89

Please show the equation used and how you arrived at answer.

A quality control expert was investigating the relationship between training (in hours) and worker efficiency

(number of product errors made per day). His results indicated a correlation coefficient of zero. Which of the

following is NOT a reason for this result?

A) Training is not effective at changing worker efficiency.

B) Correlation

can only capture positive relationships between variables not the negative

relationship apparent in the use of these variables.

C) The relationship between training and worker efficiency is non-linear.

D) A third

variable not included in the analysis may be affecting both hours of training and

worker efficiency.

R2, the coefficient of determination, detects the strength of the relationship between the dependent variable and

all independent variables.

A) True

B) False

Paper#9255774 | Written in 27-Jul-2016

Price :*$22*